Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Signed in as:
filler@godaddy.com
Real estate title fraud, also known as deed fraud or property title fraud, occurs when someone illegally transfers the ownership of a property without the true owner’s knowledge or consent. This type of fraud can allow a criminal to take out loans against the property, sell it, or otherwise assume control over it, often leaving the rightful owner unaware until they encounter issues, like foreclosure notices, unpaid bills, or when they attempt to sell or refinance.
Real estate title fraud can be complex and difficult to resolve, and prevention is often more effective than trying to recover after fraud has occurred.
California tenants will now have double the time to respond to eviction notices under a new law signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom. Assembly Bill 2347 extends the response period from five to ten business days, giving tenants more flexibility when facing legal challenges during an eviction process. However, landlords argue that this extension could exacerbate existing problems for property owners, particularly when tenants already owe significant amounts of back rent. The law comes at a time of heightened concern for landlords dealing with the aftermath of pandemic-era tenant protections, which led to a surge in unpaid rent and evictions.
Under the current system, landlords must serve tenants with an unlawful detainer notice when seeking eviction, and tenants had five business days to respond. Landlords argue that this timeline is crucial in resolving cases quickly, especially since the process often begins after tenants have already missed rent payments for several months. While tenant advocates argue that the original deadline was too short, property owners like San Francisco real estate attorney Daniel Bornstein emphasize that the eviction process can already take months and that any delay means more financial strain for landlords, who may not see any rent during this extended period.
Though the California Apartment Association did not officially oppose the bill, local landlord groups have voiced concerns. They argue that longer response times lead to unpaid rent piling up, which ultimately gets passed on to new tenants, contributing to increased rent prices. From the landlords' perspective, the law could worsen the financial burden they bear, especially for those who rely on rental income for their livelihoods. They point out that the eviction process is already heavily regulated and extending deadlines without compensating property owners only adds to their losses.
The new law, sponsored by Democratic Assemblymember Ash Kalra, also impacts legal procedures by shortening the time attorneys have to file certain motions regarding errors in a landlord’s eviction complaint. While tenants will benefit from more time to respond, landlords see this adjustment as a mixed bag—allowing the eviction process to move faster at certain stages, but still prolonging the initial response phase, which could delay resolution.
In addition to this new law, landlords have had to navigate a growing number of local regulations that often favor tenants. San Francisco, for instance, passed an ordinance in 2022 giving tenants extra time to fix issues before an eviction case could be filed. However, a state appeals court recently overturned that measure, reinforcing the need for a balanced approach to eviction laws. Landlords continue to advocate for policies that protect their interests while ensuring tenants meet their rental obligations in a timely manner.
Home prices reached their highest level in the history of the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller U.S. National Home Price Index. The mark came in spite of rising mortgage interest rates that have slowed activity.
The data, released by S&P on Tuesday, determined the average price over a three-month period from April to June, showing that prices nationally were 5.4% higher compared to the same end-month the previous year.
While it may be a record-high for home prices, the annual gain was lower than the 5.9% in May.
The average home prices in the 10-city composite increased by 7.4% annually. The figure was down from the previous month's 7.8%. On the other hand, in a 20-city composite, the rate was 6.5% higher year over year, which was actually down from May's increase of 6.9%, CNBC reported.
"The upward pressure on home prices is making this the most unaffordable housing market in history," said Bright MLS chief economist Lisa Sturtevant.
"First-time and moderate-income home buyers, in particular, increasingly are being left out of the housing market," she said in NY Post.
In a release, Brian Luke, head of commodities, real and digital assets at S&P Dow Jones Indices, stated that the gap between housing and inflation is larger.
"While both housing and inflation have slowed, the gap between the two is larger than historical norms, with our National Index averaging 2.8% more than the Consumer Price Index," said Luke.
"That is a full percentage point above the 50-year average. Before accounting for inflation, home prices have risen over 1,100% since 1974, but have slightly more than doubled (111%) after accounting for inflation," he added further.
Out of the 20 cities, it was New York that showed the highest annual gain.
Prices in NY rose up to 9% in June. Next was San Diego with an annual increase of 8.7%. Next to San Diego was Las Vegas, which showed 8.5%.
Home values were also shown by price tier in the most recent report. By perusing the large markets over the past five years, it discovered that 75% of the markets showed that low-price tiers rise faster.
"New York's low tier has the largest five-year out-performance, rising nearly 20% above the overall New York region," Luke said in the release.
Current Mortgage Rates
In summary, the current decrease in mortgage rates offers an opportunity for both new homebuyers and those looking to refinance. While future rate cuts might be possible, the current rates are competitive and may warrant action sooner rather than later.
Apply Now with Allan Paranada
By Zara Barker | June 12, 2024 | Fox 5 San Diego
SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) — Concern is growing online over a map of short-term rentals in San Diego and how it could be impacting the city’s real estate market amid a housing crisis.
The post, originally posted to Reddit, has sparked questions over its impact to the housing crisis in America’s Finest City.
City of San Diego data shows there’s 8,651 city-licensed short-term rentals in the city, with 490,219 households in the city at the last count, according to city data.
That means about 1.7% of San Diego houses are short-term rentals.
The city limits the number of short-term rentals to 1% of the city’s total housing and 30% in Mission Beach (which is likely accounting for the extra .7% in the city’s total number of rentals).
Some residents still think the limit is too high and taking away from residents needing to buy or rent.
“There might be a little too many Airbnbs,” San Diego resident Ilana Melkonian said.
However, since San Diego attracts a lot of visitors, it’s a double-edged sword.
“I would love to buy something and also buy one as an Airbnb, so it’s a love-hate with the situation,” Melkonian added.
“Airbnb’s, they’re here, they’re going to stay,” Real Estate Expert, No Bull Agent Ken Kaplan said.
On the original post, one Reddit user commented, “So this is why I can’t find affordable rental housing for my family.”
“How expensive?” tracks measurements of California’s totally unaffordable housing market.
The pain: California apartment dwellers not only face sky-high rents, they don’t get much space for the dollars they pay to landlords.
The source: My trusty spreadsheet reviewed a RentCafe study of average rents and apartment sizes by state as of March 2024, tracking what kind of bang for the buck California tenants get.
The pinch
California rents in early 2024 equaled $2.96 per square foot, the fifth-highest expense among the states and 55% above the $1.91 per square foot charged nationally.
And where is this cost yardstick higher? Washington, D.C. is tops at $3.20 per square foot, followed by New York at $3.18, Massachusetts at $3.06 and Hawaii at $2.98.
Now, if you’re seeking a space bargain, head to North Dakota for $1.08 per square foot. Next is Oklahoma at $1.17, Arkansas at $1.19, South Dakota at $1.23 and Mississippi at $1.26.
Oh, and California’s big economic rivals? Texas is 29th highest at $1.64 and Florida No. 19 at $2.
Pressure points
How did we get to this cost absurdity? Well, it’s a painful mix of tiny units at big prices in California.
Let’s start with what space a renter gets.
California’s average apartment size is the 11th-smallest nationally at 851 square feet, which is 5% below the 899 square feet for the U.S.
It’s the Inland Empire with its fast-growing economy. It could not keep pace with the rising cost of being a tenant by the widest margin in California. But how did San Diego fare?
Orange County Register article by Jonathan Lansner
May 12, 2024
The pain: Rent hikes outpaced pay raises in 44 of 50 big U.S. metropolitan areas during the past four years — and in four of six metros from California in this study.
The source: My trusty spreadsheet reviewed Zillow’s analysis of the growth in rents vs. increases in average hourly earnings between 2019 and 2023 across the nation.
The pandemic economy was not kind to renters. Nationally, rents jumped 30.4 percent over four years vs. pay hikes of 20.2 percent — a 10.2 percentage-point cost shortfall for the typical tenant.
Next, consider the Inland Empire’s fast-growing economy. It could not keep pace with the rising cost of being a tenant by the widest margin in California.
In the past four years, rents in Riverside and San Bernardino counties jumped by 41.4 percent (the fourth-largest bump among the 50 metros). Meanwhile, wages in the Inland Empire rose by 23.3 percent (No. 7 nationally).
That meant the Inland Empire’s typical paycheck trailed the monthly rent check by 18.1 percentage points — the 16th worst gap among the 50.
The worst shortfall, nationally speaking? Tampa! Its 50 percent rent hike (No. 2 of the 50) badly trailed 15.3 percent raises (No. 27) — for a 34.7-point gap.
Planning commissioners said Hillcrest and University City are ideal for high-rise housing and dense development because they’re already something like a second downtown for San Diego.
The San Diego Union-Tribune article by David Garrick
May 30, 2024
SAN DIEGO — Hillcrest and University City got one step closer to becoming more urban and heavily populated Thursday when the San Diego Planning Commission approved aggressive new growth blueprints for both neighborhoods.
The new blueprints, which aim to double the populations of both neighborhoods within 30 years, now move to the City Council’s housing committee in mid-June and then the full council for final approval in July.
The Planning Commission’s unanimous vote came despite ardent opposition from many residents in both neighborhoods. They raised concerns about insufficient parks, gentrification, congestion and evacuation routes.
Planning commissioners said the two neighborhoods are ideal for high-rise housing and dense development because they are already job centers in appealing locations with strong demand for housing.
They characterized Hillcrest and University City as the two city neighborhoods that could best be described as a second downtown for San Diego.
“The university neighborhood’s always been our second downtown,” said Commissioner Matthew Boomhower.
“More housing and employment options here make so much sense.”
Last year developers completed 39% more new rental homes than in 2022
The Wall Street Journal article by Will Parker
May 14, 2024
Developers are building new houses for rent at an unprecedented rate, aiming to capitalize on the steep home prices and higher mortgage rates that are forcing many Americans to keep renting.
In 2023, 93,000 new single-family homes for rent were completed, according to estimates from housing consulting firm John Burns Research and Consulting.
That was 39% more rental homes than in 2022, and the most in any year ever. The breakneck pace is poised to continue this year before easing by 2025.
New rental homes come in all shapes and sizes, from one-bedroom cottages to five-bedroom spreads with big backyards. Some are townhomes, others are detached houses. They are sprouting up especially in outer-ring suburbs of Arizona, Texas and Florida cities, and in other places with fast population and job growth.
While rent growth has slowed from its double-digit-percentage pandemic peaks, rents for houses are still trending higher than those for apartments, according to JBRC. Occupancy, which has been slipping in multifamily buildings, has also been more resilient in the rental-house sector, indicating more sustained demand.
Rental builders are betting that the lowest level of home affordability since the 1980s means that even relatively affluent Americans will remain renters, squeezed by near record home prices, mortgage rates above 7% and other rising home-related costs. A large number of people also simply prefer to rent a house, builders say.
The latest news on realtor commissions is that the National Association of Realtors (NAR) has reached a national settlement that could change the way real estate agents are paid. The settlement, which was announced on March 15, 2024, could potentially end the 6% commission rate that has been standard in the industry for decades.
According to the settlement, the NAR will pay $418 million in damages to settle lawsuits alleging that the organization and its members artificially inflated commissions. As part of the agreement, the NAR will also eliminate its rules on commissions, which could lead to a reduction in commission rates for real estate agents.
The news has sent shockwaves through the real estate industry, with some experts predicting that commission rates could be slashed by up to 30%. This could have a significant impact on the earnings of the 1.6 million real estate agents who rely on commissions for their income.
The settlement is expected to be filed in court within weeks and still needs to be approved by a federal court. However, if approved, it could have far-reaching implications for the real estate industry and the way that agents are paid.
Key points:
Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) have been gaining popularity in San Diego and many other areas across the United States for several reasons:
We at Fidelis Private Fund have been financing ADU projects since the the demand to finance such projects started gaining popularity a few years back. This trend aligns with our commitment to providing innovative financing solutions that support sustainable and affordable housing initiatives.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.